|
|
Print-friendly version
Projects
Grave Yard Survey The above Course has now been confirmed and will take place over two evenings. Please note that there will be a small charge for this course TBA. TUTOR MR. RON GURNEY MONDAY 9th JUNE 2008
TIME 7.00 pm – 10.00 pm
VENUE LOWER CHAPELS CHURCH CHAPELS DARWEN THE GROUP WILL SUPPLY ITEMS OF EQUIPMENT BUT YOU WILL NEED TO BRING YOUR OWN TROWEL 3 METRE TAPE MEASURE 4H PENCIL ERASER RULER LINE LEVEL CLIP BOARD 4 X 6" NAILS STRING/CORD FOR LINE All these items are available at Gibsons Hardware in Darwen & most hardware suppliers.
‘GRAVEYARD SURVEY’ DLHS is running two /three classes on How to Survey Graveyards.
A grant has been obtained from Lancashire County department of environment to undertake surveys of endangered graveyards.
We have obtained the services of Archaeologist Ron Gurney as our tutor teaching the correct procedures to follow and instructions will be given in the use of surveying equipment, measuring, recording and photographing of the graves so that the information can be put onto a national database. Guidelines for the survey will be taken from:
‘GRAVEYARD SURVEY’ ‘RECORDING AND ANALYSING GRAVEYARDS’ by Harold Mytum. Techniques from The Council for British Archaeology (CBA) Publication.
These classes will be open to anyone who wishes to learn these procedures and put them to practice in the own locality. Further information can be obtained from DLHS Sec. Pauline Hodkinson There will be a nominal cost for these classes and interested parties do not have to be members of DLHS
(See also books) (Naomi Caine started her career almost 20 years ago. She joined The Sunday Times in 1996 and was editor of the personal finance section for six years. She has freelanced for the past two years)
The expensive real estate of the dead
By Naomi Caine April 23 2008 MSN If you are fussy about your remains, you should reserve a burial plot now. If your local council doesn't allow you to stake your claim on a grave, you'd better get used to the idea of cremation because the nation's cemeteries are running out of space. In fact, the cemetery squeeze is so bad that some areas could have no room for the dead by 2020. In a survey of burial grounds conducted by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) published last year, London is predicted to run out of space for burials in 12 years. The West Midlands and the North West are also crowded and could fill up in the next 20 years. It might happen even sooner. Redditch Borough Council recently announced that it would run out of burial space in five years' time. No more room Some cemeteries are already closed to new burials, often forcing relatives to travel miles to tend and visit graves. More than 10% of the 2,000 cemeteries owned by local authorities in England and Wales are closed to new burials. A further 12% are open only to burials in existing graves, according to the DCA research. The pressure on space tends to be more acute in urban areas. In Birmingham, for example, six sites are closed to new burials. The capital is also under pressure. Just look at east London where the cemetery at Tower Hamlets is closed and Walthamstow cemetery is full. It's a similar story right across London. The fatal flaw of cemeteries So what's the problem? Many of our cemeteries date back to the 1820s and they started to fill up during the population explosion of the 19th century, when towns and cities grew by as much as 150% every 20 years. It was common to reuse graves at the time, but the rapid population growth caused a problem for gravediggers who would often uncover rotting flesh rather than old bones. So the Victorians banned the reuse of graves completely. Hence the cemetery squeeze today. And things can only get worse because we all die eventually - and many of us still choose to be buried. There are about 150,000 burials a year, which is less than the typical annual total of 350,000 cremations, but it's still a lot of bodies. We also have to bear in mind that some religions, notably Judaism and Islam, don't favour cremation, so will always need burial space. Where to do? Local authorities are under no statutory obligation to provide a suitable burial ground, but you can't just dump the dead in the back garden. So where to put the bodies? One solution would be to buy more land. But the rising cost makes new purchases prohibitively expensive. The answer is to cram in more graves. And last year, the government gave the go-ahead for body stacking, known in the trade as the "lift and deepen" method. Bodies are dug up and re-buried in deeper ground to allow another coffin to be interred above. The name of the new arrival can even be added to the headstone. Councils will normally only select graves that are untended, suggesting they are not visited, and are 100 years old or more. But they might dig up 75-year-old graves if the pressure for space is intense. However, permission to dig up the remains is given only if there are no objections from descendants of the dead, if they can be tracked down. Families who object are allowed to defer the exhumation for "at least" a generation. It's not going to solve the problem overnight. So in the meantime, councils use fees to manage demand. Losing the plot Yes, it can be costly to die, with fees of up to £4,000. You don't strictly buy a grave, but a burial right, which typically lasts 100 years, although some councils restrict the right to 50 years. If you want to extend your right, it costs extra. The cheapest option is usually a public grave, which is owned by the local authority, so they decide who is buried in the plot. Or you can pay for a private grave, which gives you control over the coffins. Some authorities offer different types of private grave at different prices, with perhaps a restriction on the type of headstone or number of people to be buried. You are also typically charged extra if you live outside the borough. Demand fuels prices The cemetery squeeze has certainly pushed up prices. In Bromley, for example, there are seven cemeteries but only three are available for new burials, so the prices are high. A private plot for one adult with burial rights for 60 years costs £2,999 - or a stonking £11,996 if you lived outside the borough. Barking & Dagenham is cheaper, but you would still be looking at a bill for more than £2,300 for a single private grave with burial rights for 50 years. And that's before you've paid for the funeral. Pretty soon, only the wealthy will be able to afford the fees and burial plots could become the new status symbol. Better off for the living Could the land be put to better use? Local authority burial grounds cover more than 5,000 hectares in total. So shouldn't we be stacking up houses not bodies? Why use land to bury the dead when it could be used to house the living? You could probably build more than 300,000 homes on those 5,000 hectares of valuable land. But think of the problems. First of all, how would you like some developer to come along and dig up your great aunt's body so he could build some flats? There would also be religious opposition to the use of any consecrated ground. Even if you aren't squeamish or religious, it's worth noting that cemeteries can account for up to half of all green open space in some local authorities, according to the Commission for Architecture and the Built Environment (CABE). In the borough of Newham, for example, 60% of public open space is made up of cemetery land. "The great Victorian cemeteries were designed and maintained as beautiful public parks for the enjoyment of all. Every local authority should have them in their green space strategy and ensure that their full value is realised," said CABE.
It's hard to disagree. It might be nice if we preserved a little of our history - and our open space - and treated our cemeteries and their inhabitants with some respect.
Due to recent inaccurate media reports the following disclaimer & corrections have been published by us.
Disclaimer to Lancashire Evening Telegraph. 21/4/08
Dear Editor
It is with dismay that we have to comment on Saturday’s (April 19th 2008) article on ‘Graveyard Survey’.
Even after forwarding written information (via email) with regards to one of our projects, your reporter Nafeesa Shan, seemingly wished to enhance it with incorrect and misplaced editing the result of which our Secretary Pauline Hodkinson had over 18 phone calls, some abusive others complaining of incorrect information concerning the following:
- ‘Historians are to survey 10,000 graves in Darwen to protect burial sites from future developments’
This is not the intent behind this survey; it is to collate the information on a National database for archaeologist, historians and genealogist to use.
- ‘. be a reference point for developers to investigate if the land they were building on was a former cemetery’
This was not stated either over the phone or in our copy.
- ‘recent speculation that there could still be a graveyard on the multimillion-pound Darwen Academy site in the Redearth Triangle’
Factually incorrect, as there is a graveyard on this site (see Gifford’s Report Archaeological Survey of Redearth)
- ‘it comes after B with D Council excavated hundreds of bodies at St Peters Cemetery, Blackburn, last year when they discovered the graveyard while building a new dual carriageway. Due to size of the task the Society is also asking for anyone who would like to take part’
As Darwen Local History Society we are not in a position to nor would we comment on Blackburn’s graveyards. The positioning of this paragraph in context is misplaced as it implies that we have made this statement, when we did not. The statement is factually incorrect and advise Miss Shan to do the adequate research before going to print. ie the carriageway has not yet been built and the bodies remain in situ. - ‘the history society is running a series of classes on how to survey graveyards, one on Monday at Bridge Street Sports and Social Club at 7.15’
The main reason that Miss Shan was doing the article was to promote our meeting on Monday, where we have a speaker John Trippier, for which she was given a poster with all the information on (please see attached poster) along with written info about the surveying classes (please see attached info) At no point was Miss Shan given the impression that we were holding a survey class on Monday and is totally incorrect.
As we do not wish anything like this to occur again, any information with regards to Darwen Local History Society can be obtained from our website www.dlhs.co.uk .
Regards
|
|